Reading all
82 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
6/29/2025 7:13:45 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 23: OPA Elections Subject: 2025 OPA Board Election Msg# 1229604
|
||||||
|
Joe:
”he should not be so publicly attacking Candidate Amy Peck over it.” I have not done anything of the kind and you know it. “attacking Candidate Amy Peck”? I understand you’d like to see another gadfly sitting on the board to generate confrontation but your support of Peck and your criticism of Lakernick is obvious, and becoming quite tedious. Marty |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Ed, whatever Marty is saying, he should not be so publicly attacking Candidate Amy Peck over it. Peck is simply quoting OPA. Second column is listed as “New Violations.” Shows 435. Peck did not write that. Why is anyone attacking Peck for quoting an OPA document? This is no more than a disgusting attempt to smear a board candidate. Staff continues to use the exact same language. It seems everyone understood the meaning until Peck quoted it. These attacks on this issue are shameful.  . |
