I agree. But why wait until next year?

But common sense prevails and as Elaine and others stated, sounds like the regulatory stance is one sign per candidate or question per property. 

Common sense is good. However, it seems the board may only consider common sense when it benefits the board and not always association members. 

Common sense to allow open burning of wood when the DRs say no open burning of wood? While issuing violations for leaves on lots in a forest on the premise of a fire danger?

Common sense to say nothing over 10 inches high in the easement areas along roads? Enforcement will provide at least 2000 violations.

Then there is the "board" parlimentarian showing up to give public comments at a Elections Committee meeting for two purposes, one to explain the sign regs and the other to tell the committee it can go into closed session for purpose of determining candidate questions. All over candidate Amy Peck.

The committee did go into closed session. No vote. No HOA Act reason.

No one really cares. Certainly not the board, as it continues to praise the Elections Committee chair to the high heavens.

I love this place.

As usual, your participation here is greatly appreciated. Thank you.