Reading all
112 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
8/10/2021 7:01:58 AM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Farr Sues OPA Msg# 1134427
|
||||||
| It was pointed out multiple times that Farr was at fault in both public comments as well as after. I was at the meeting and that bothered me. I do agree with most of the crowd was supportive of Farr. The comments about Farr by the board after public comment is not fair…they should follow the rules put on us. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: I am not sure what you mean. I am thinking you are referencing comments made about Farr AFTER public comments during board discussion of the motion. The limitation on discussing Farr’s eligibility only applied to public comments. Board members are not limited by that when discussing a motion. During public comments it seems the vast majority were supportive of Farr. In terms of fairness, many of the public comments actually did deal with Farr’s eligibility. |
| Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
Annual Meeting - Assateague Room
8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |