Reading all 379 messages in thread
message board home

1/23/2008 9:00:16 PM

Reply or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board
Subject: Board Punts on Slots Msg# 528007

From:

Joe Reynolds OceanPinesForum.com

Joined 8/1/1999

To:

Bill Rakow (Read) Past OPA Board Member 2007-2010

Joined 5/20/2004

Bill, you keep repeating my words of "patently absurd" totally out of context.

I did not write that "your position is patently absurd." I did write the following about one of your comments in regard to obtaining money from the county:

To suggest that the county and some development council is going to provide OPA with more funds than if OPA was allocated 10%, as was Berlin, is patently absurd.

I stand by my actual words above 100%. If you are going to use my words, please use them in context and obvious original intent. I suspect at least 90% of lot owners would agree with my actual statement above.

For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where:

on this issue, you and the Board failed.

Well, you have the right to your opinion. I believe we did the correct thing. All the arguments that our position is patently absurd and we are wimps have not changed my mind on that.

If you think that we failed because we did not undertake a battle based on a flawed premise that just because OC and Berlin received a % of future distributions we deserve a % too, I can understand that, but I do not agree. Besides, I also believe that the Board to take the lead in something like that is an improper thing to do. It's political shenanigans. Should the membership do so, that's up to them.

message board home