What, in your opinion, does it mean if the board just “votes to send to legal” and does not also find the lot owner in “continuing violation?”

In my opinion, the lot owner can still vote, etc.

I suggested, but never saw any response, that the membership roles be checked to be sure no association member be denied a ballot unless the board voted to find the lot in continuing violation. Lakernick’s last motion on violations did not include finding the lots in continuing violation.

Also, I believe the motion should specify each individual lot and specific violations, not just reference some list read by staff in the GM board  report.

I would also suggest each board member visit each violation and view personally prior to the meeting before voting.

Extreme? Maybe. Fair thing to do? Yes.