message board home
Next
7/6/2025 6:51:44 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Continuing Violation Msg# 1229960
|
||||||
|
Joe:
I am not qualified to answer. However, in my personal opinion the property owner needs to be found in continuing violation by the board before any other formal action. I am in agreement that the property owners should be copied (notice) the CPI letter to the board asking for said property to be found in continuing violation with a complete description of why. In the early days, the board would actually get in a bus and ride to all of the violations and see them firsthand. I think that may have gone away sometime after Tim Stoner. When I was on the board, I always visited any property that was going to be voted on under section 14 where we were gonna do work and bill the property owner. I think the property visit is a good idea. Marty |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Marty, to move the board voting on violations to a new dedicated subject: What, in your opinion, does it mean if the board just “votes to send to legal” and does not also find the lot owner in “continuing violation?” In my opinion, the lot owner can still vote, etc. I suggested, but never saw any response, that the membership roles be checked to be sure no association member be denied a ballot unless the board voted to find the lot in continuing violation. Lakernick’s last motion on violations did not include finding the lots in continuing violation. Also, I believe the motion should specify each individual lot and specific violations, not just reference some list read by staff in the GM board report. I would also suggest each board member visit each violation and view personally prior to the meeting before voting. Extreme? Maybe. Fair thing to do? Yes. |
| Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
Annual Meeting - Assateague Room
8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |