Here is something important. CPI inspectors are OPA employees, hired by the General Manager. They are not board members, and they are not members of ARC or ECC. 

While DR enforcement is important, CPI inspectors following all the stuff in the Guidelines in some EXACT manner may not always make sense. CPI inspectors possess no enforcement powers, but every item they file, no matter how minor, goes up the line.

First emphasis should be on those properties that are a complete mess (obvious violation that harm property values), followed by what might seem minor issues but with many, many violations in total lead to reduced property values -- such as storage of multiple trash cans directly in front of homes.

I'm not sure how any GM would or should convey use of "common sense" to his CPI employees in issuing violations, but it seems necessary to me. Many other association members might actually appreciate this strict-in-every-way notice of violations. I have no idea.

Beyond any GM advice to inspectors on using common sense is the big picture after serious violations are charged. There is a place on the parkway that's a complete mess with at least one junk car. It has been that way for years. There are other similar messes.

Marty Clarke likes to reference a junk car OPA went to court over perhaps 10 years ago. Apparently it may be back now.

As an aside, perhaps CPI should start issuing violations (if possible) to the parent/owners of lots in OPA whose children are playing soccer on golf greens or otherwise out using the golf course for activities other than golf - as pointed out by board member Rick Farr at the last meeting.

Another aside - agree or disagree with the below from the Internet but the idea is somewhat analogous to CPI work:

In law enforcement, common sense enforcement refers to the practical application of reasonable judgment and discretion by officers in their daily duties. It's about using life experience, good judgment, and logical decision-making to guide police actions, often going beyond strict rules and procedures. This includes making decisions that are not explicitly outlined in written policies, but are considered reasonable based on the circumstances.