Forgive me, but your comments on this are extremely troubling. Newly elected candidates, especially a board majority, should not even be talking about meeting as a newly elected group to talk about anything related to OPA.

As far as I am concerned the candidates could meet and draft this document next week.  That might put Ted in an awkward position, and we would have input from three candidates that will not be elected, but what’s the harm in doing so?

That would violate no law or bylaw I am aware of, but I believe it would be a major mistake for all the candidates deciding to do this.

I like Slobodan and Doug. I value both of their inputs and work on behalf of the homeowners. I don’t always agree with their methods. Perhaps my plan will keep both on the Board where their talents and insights will be helpful to the new Directors.

Now you trouble me more. Perhaps I misunderstand what you mean. Your words indicate you would want to have a PLAN among four newly elected board members to keep Trendic and Parks on the board.  What makes you think at this point in time, a little over a month from the election, that either Parks or Trendic will be off the board shortly after the election unless this newly elected group keeps them on the board?