List All Forums | About

Reading all 203 messages in thread
message board home

Prev
Next

6/25/2010 2:23:41 PM

Reply or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board
Subject: Marty and the Trailer Msg# 743702

From:

Marty Clarke Past OPA Board Member

Joined 8/15/2004

To:

Nancy Weber (Read)

Joined 5/5/2004

Nancy:

Paster Abent did exactly what you and Bill Zawacki suggest only to be flat rejected with no fall back position. It was the ECC way or the highway. One particular inspector (employee) has stated that he does not like work trailers and that is that. We will see.

Have a great weekend.

Marty

For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where:

Bill,

The counties all have "Special Exceptions" allowed for just about anything.

How hard would it be for ARC /ECC to allow a person to present a plan that shows concern for aestheticsand a real need for the trailer?

In most cases, a higher fence than is usually allowed in OP would be needed because you can't expect an "iinstant hedge" to pop up.

There are WAYS to get around UGLY....and THE REAL ISSUE IS ABOUT UGLY.

I do think we should go after the hideous boat situations also. There is no excuse to be a PIG..."Boating Community" or not.

Nancy