Reading all
263 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
12/8/2022 9:21:38 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 21: Community News Subject: Ortt and DeAngelus Split Msg# 1178922
|
||||||
|
Nate wrote: "I agree, one sign bad, they’re all bad. They all support one cause or another. OPA should not be in the business of picking and choosing which cause is a righteous cause."
You replied: " You're kidding, right?" I wrote: "Maybe I misunderstood, but I thought Nate was simply saying OPA should enforce the no-signs Guidelines/DR with no consideration of what message is displayed on the signs." You replied: "Yes, Nate simply said that." I suppose I am wondering what your question to Nate of " You're kidding, right?" meant. I took it to mean you did not agree with him????? Are you saying OPA should enforce the sign policy based on the content of signs? Confused on Watertown. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Yes, Nate simply said that. |
| Calendar |
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhpuse
6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
OPA Board Meeting - Golf Clubhouse
7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
|
Annual Meeting - Assateague Room
8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |