Reading all
379 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
1/22/2008 9:40:30 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Board Punts on Slots Msg# 527707
|
||||||
|
Do you believe that Worcester County is going to have to justify direct and indirect impacts from slots in order to get the 5.6%? I do. This whole thing is a political game to get folks scrambling after slots bucks and keep them from being focused on preventing them in the first place which should go a long way toward helping to get the slots referendum voted in. It seems to be working. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Bill, The entire 5.6% of slots proceeds that are to go to local governments (Worcester County being one of them) are labeled as local impact grants. Do you believe that Worcester County is going to have to justify direct and indirect impacts from slots in order to get the 5.6%?
|
