Reading all
379 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
1/22/2008 10:00:33 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Board Punts on Slots Msg# 527720
|
||||||
Jack, if you think Worcester County will have to justify direct and indirect impacts to get the money then please show me in the bill where this is required and to whom the county will justify. Besides, even if some wording indicates it, the bill-approved uses for the slots money are so broad the county would have no trouble justifying $100 million. 
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Do you believe that Worcester County is going to have to justify direct and indirect impacts from slots in order to get the 5.6%? I do. This whole thing is a political game to get folks scrambling after slots bucks and keep them from being focused on preventing them in the first place which should go a long way toward helping to get the slots referendum voted in. It seems to be working. |
