If Peck called committee chair Ransdell, as was appropriate, and he told her that clicking on the Internet link in the email from MK would not cast a vote if she had already been told her paper ballot was received, why on earth should she be blamed for clicking on it to see if Ransdell was correct or not?

The error, and what should be the focus of interest, is MK's and then Ransdell giving an association member incorrect information about MK's error.

Maybe, just maybe, Farr and others on the board should be thanking Peck on this issue rather than obsessing over her every comment. Her "service" to OPA on this issue was proving that the information given to her by Randell was incorrect, resulting in MK's subsequent admission of the error and its correction. Ransdell continues to provide inaccurate information as was evident in the the last Election Committee meeting video.

No one should forget that Rick Farr started this by writing that "MK told us" that a former board member voted twice. Then Rick doubled down and said his memory on that was correct.

How can anyone involved in this discussion just focus on Peck and not what Rick wrote?