![]() ![]() ![]() Section 21: Community News Subject: Lifeguard Shortage Continues Msg# 1186186
|
||||||
I hope they do at least require proof this season. I mean regardless of what decisions are thought to be best for pay and pricing, not requiring proof of rental/residency is just silly, lazy wastefulness. Thanks for noting that will change, phew.
I know that the issue of private/public is a huge tax concern because legally, we cannot be private and tax-exempt and we cannot be public and have no lifeguard per MD law. I do believe though, that we should pay a large amount to keep the pools open. There were many years when other funds covered amenity losses. Opa budget has plenty profit overall, and ability to put away the enormous planned reserves, etc. I don't understand why a huge amenity should be allowed to be closed for fiscal reasons unless the projected loss was astronomical. It doesn't seem that would be the case paying 20 instead of 14. I shouldn't complain though, as my favorite pool is the yacht club one. And they sure aren't going to close that one. Might be more crowded though. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Not to mention the ridiculousness of not even enforcing proving residency or renting, in any event, they should be requiring that proof or charging the higher rate. I agree. I understand that will be happening this year. I have heard some stats indicating not one person who complained about Mumford Pool not being opened last year for short periods ever used the Mumford Pool, ever. Anyway, money, at least reasonable money, may not be the answer. Lack of lifeguards is a national problem. Summer Lifeguard Shortage 'As Bad As Last Year, Or Worse' Looms |
Calendar |
![]() 5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |