I took strong exception to much of what I read in the Esther Diller edition of the Progress. Still do.

Why do you object so much to quoting and analysis what you had to say in the Progress. A major newspaper in OP devotes pages to you and your opinions and charges and complaints and you are now upset because I write some commentary about those pages of newsprint.

I have no problem at all with Stauss or his paper. He has his opinions. I have mine  I wrote nothing at all derogatory about Stauss or the Progress.

Did you actually expect that providing the Progress with an interview and the subsequent incredible volume of coverage of your accusations to simply be accepted at face value with no comments?

Your “proof” of a smear campaign against you emanating from OPA computers is non-existent and irresponsible at this point. 

I was not the one who wrote that if Stuart was elected OPA would get two directors for the price of one.