![]() ![]() Section 5: OPA Board Subject: A Preview of the Future Msg# 1131729
|
||||||
Robert, is Ester Diller a CONVICTED felon or not? If she pled GUILTY to a Federal crime that is no different than if a jury of her peers found her guilty, actually a guilty plea is even stronger than a jury finding of guilty as it is 100% certain.
If she did plead guilty to a Federal felony what is all the fuss about? |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: So, was there anything that “Op Truth and Justice” wrote/said that was untrue or libelous? Or is everything he/she said correct, and the only real issue here is his/her anonymity? Seems Diller is rather fixated on finding out the identity of the—*achem,*— “suspect.” A pessimist might think this is because the content of the materials sent out by the “suspect” was pretty on point, not to mention incredibly damaging to her reputation, so loudly and publicly focusing on unmasking this person might serve as a distraction. I mean, at the end of the day, as long as nothing false was said, does it matter as anything but a curiosity? Don’t get me wrong, I’m of the mind that if you’re going to go after someone, hiding behind some pompous assumed name is about as cowardly as you can get, but that’s not really the issue, is it? “Aha! My weird, paranoid sleuthing has revealed that it was indeed [insert name] who said all of those true things about me! [insert name] has a political motive and a personal bias against me! Therefore, no one should pay attention to anything [insert name] says about me, regardless of how damning it is, or how objectively true it may be!” This is all very weird. |
Calendar |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |