![]() ![]() Section 5: OPA Board Subject: A Preview of the Future Msg# 1131715
|
||||||
So, was there anything that “Op Truth and Justice” wrote/said that was untrue or libelous? Or is everything he/she said correct, and the only real issue here is his/her anonymity? Seems Diller is rather fixated on finding out the identity of the—*achem,*— “suspect.” A pessimist might think this is because the content of the materials sent out by the “suspect” was pretty on point, not to mention incredibly damaging to her reputation, so loudly and publicly focusing on unmasking this person might serve as a distraction.
I mean, at the end of the day, as long as nothing false was said, does it matter as anything but a curiosity? Don’t get me wrong, I’m of the mind that if you’re going to go after someone, hiding behind some pompous assumed name is about as cowardly as you can get, but that’s not really the issue, is it? “Aha! My weird, paranoid sleuthing has revealed that it was indeed [insert name] who said all of those true things about me! [insert name] has a political motive and a personal bias against me! Therefore, no one should pay attention to anything [insert name] says about me, regardless of how damning it is, or how objectively true it may be!” This is all very weird. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Ken, good point. Again, Diller’s comment about the source of email addresses is ridiculous. And yet, some people will believe anything when it comes to rationalizing their political views. |
Calendar |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |