message board home
Next
1/22/2008 4:03:37 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Board Punts on Slots Msg# 527522
|
||||||
|
Just the three of us met with Mathias. I am not going to attempt to explain to you every exact thing we asked him, or exactly how he responded, or if he responded with what we believe was sincerity, or otherwise attempt to interpret every nuance of questions and responses. In any 45-minute exchange there are many things said - and not said - that guides one to a conclusion. Joe, give it a rest. What, I posted one message in response to yours and you come back with - what - 11 posts to me. Sounds like you are knee jerking and have lost your "balance." Just because three of us do not agree with you, you don't have to become so "patently absurd." |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Since you met with Mathias, according to your post, did the three of you ask Mathias if he would introduce legislation to obtain 10% for OPA? If so, what was his response. Also, in these meetings, was anyone else from OPA present other than you three board members. I know Dan Stachurski and Roseanne Bridgman both offered to participate, and both seemed to support the noting of trying, trying hard. |
BTW, we did look at both sides; your response seems to understand that there is no other side. 
