message board home
Next
1/24/2008 4:11:29 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Board Punts on Slots Msg# 528306
|
||||||
|
I said what I said. You need to read it carefully so you won't have so many questions. You seem to be unable to resist coming up with interpretations of your own. That's why I'm asking about your "situational ethics" comment. Your continued inquisitions of those who have a differing belief or opinion is patently absurd. Inquisitions? Seems like we are back to the double standard again. Your continued jabbering Bill, it is obvious you really don't want to answer any questions on this issue. By the way, I found the last sentence of the press release interesting: Therefore, at this time, the Ocean Pines Association Board of Directors will not recommend nor participate in any actions related to the “slots issue” until further notice.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Are you saying it would be unethical for the OPA Board of Directors to seek a 10% cut of slots funds within a normal ethical context, or that others are using situational ethics to justify asking for 10%. I said what I said. You need to read it carefully so you won't have so many questions. I do not need to apply what I believe to others; the other Board members may come to their own conclusions. Your continued jabbering on this is the exact reason that I will not share with you the conversations I have had with others. You seem to be unable to resist coming up with interpretations of your own. You should be able to accept an explanation without mocking statements such as: You can't make this stuff up. Your continued inquisitions of those who have a differing belief or opinion is patently absurd. |
