![]() ![]() Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Board Punts on Slots Msg# 528282
|
||||||
Are you saying it would be unethical for the OPA Board of Directors to seek a 10% cut of slots funds within a normal ethical context, or that others are using situational ethics to justify asking for 10%. I said what I said. You need to read it carefully so you won't have so many questions. I do not need to apply what I believe to others; the other Board members may come to their own conclusions. Your continued jabbering on this is the exact reason that I will not share with you the conversations I have had with others. You seem to be unable to resist coming up with interpretations of your own. You should be able to accept an explanation without mocking statements such as: You can't make this stuff up. Your continued inquisitions of those who have a differing belief or opinion is patently absurd. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: What we face as a Board, as I see it, it is a clear case of situational ethics. Are you saying it would be unethical for the OPA Board of Directors to seek a 10% cut of slots funds within a normal ethical context, or that others are using situational ethics to justify asking for 10%. Either way, it once again proves You can't make this stuff up. For those who are interested, In 1966 American episcopal moral theologian Joseph Fletcher published a popular book titled, Situation Ethics: The New Morality. In the book he advocated a 'new' approach to Christian ethics and moral decision-making which occupied a middle way between the two extremes of legalism and antinomianism. |