![]() ![]() Section 5: OPA Board Subject: Farr Motion to Hire MK Msg# 1224671
|
||||||
Madam Peck, you freely admit that you knowingly voted twice. For yourself one supposes.You owe us an explanation as to why. You have been less than forthcoming on this important detail.
Furthermore, it occurs to me that MK, knowing that there were irregularities going on, did precisely the right thing in notifying OPA. It was me – I’m the one that discovered this fault and notified the correct parties.
They should NOT BE NOTIFYING ANYONE AT ALL specific voter activity. They certainly shouldn’t be talking to the Board President at the time Rick Farr who also a candidate.
|
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: The real issue: Rick Farr asserts that this election contractor was providing him details about a specific property owner’s voting activity. Because of that breach, MK Elections should not be hired. Period. Full stop. Madam Peck, you freely admit that you knowingly voted twice. For yourself one supposes. You owe us an explanation as to why. You have been less than forthcoming on this important detail. It is more than a mere detail. It is the central issue here. I want to know why you voted twice. Furthermore, it occurs to me that MK, knowing that there were irregularities going on, did precisely the right thing in notifying OPA. Who do you think they should have notified? Please be specific. As for a "specific property owner" are you suggesting that the 32 or 33 properties that voted twice should not have been identified? Why shouldn't they be identified? You were a candidate. You knowingly violated the most basic rule. Yet you seem irked that OPA was notified. |
Calendar |
![]() 5/24/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 6/28/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 7/26/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |
![]() 8/9/2025 - 9:00 A.M. |